Category: Education Article

How to Increase Productivity in a Working Place

High performance in companies and other institutions is the key to success, and needs to be kept on the highest level possible. There are many ways in which one can increase productivity within an institution, and this takes several measures. If these measures are implemented properly, then one can expect high levels of production at the end of a working day or period.

1. Designate favorable working times

Performance can be increased by identifying favorable times to handle specific tasks. Many people prefer handling technical and hard work in the mornings, as the mind is fresh and thinking straight. You can involve participants into working harder during the mornings and let them work freely in the afternoons.

2. Best goals to achieve each day

Most people are motivated differently, but with goals set, they can achieve higher productivity within a very short

This article first appeared in the Teaching Professor on May 18, 2017. © Magna Publications. All rights reserved.

I was watching a video of several of my students teaching this week. I had to be away for a conference, and they were scheduled to teach that day anyway, so I asked our Center for Teaching Excellence to record it. I would evaluate them later. Although most of the students in the class are planning to be English teachers, it’s not an education class. For that reason, I planned to pay closer attention to the content and preparation than to their actual pedagogy.

However, as I watched the video, I kept noticing places where discussion would be on the verge of beginning, only to see it die almost immediately. The students were prepared, and they were often asking the types of questions we want them to ask. Why did the discussion

This article first appeared in the Teaching Professor on December 17, 2018. © Magna Publications. All rights reserved.

First snowflakes of the season today. Winter is settling in out here in the Pennsylvania countryside. It’s quiet, no birdsongs in the morning, few leaves left on the trees to rustle, and frost muting the crunch of those on the ground. In the woods where I walk, the silence brings everything else into sharper focus.

We don’t always think about silence positively. Visitors sometimes tell us it’s too quiet out here. They feel anxious. Silence can be awkward—we’ve all had those moments of not knowing what to say. It can also feel like an affront. Ask a question in class, hear the silence, and feel a small surge of anger. It’s a confrontation. It’s students’ way of saying that they don’t want to sit at this learning table we’ve so carefully set.

Here, a relatively simple approach to teaching and checking for student criticality is explained, where conceptual, alongside applied learning, is pervasive. It revolves around a two-directional spotlight approach of scrutinizing practice in the light of theory and scrutinizing theory in the light of experience.

The ability to critically analyze and evaluate is essential for student progression through degree courses. It is a key element in the higher levels of cognitive taxonomy and is reflected as such for sector quality (e,g. in the UK’s Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, QAA, 2014) and for specific course design (e.g. in the language of learning outcomes for the later stage modules of programs). It is also depicted as a crucial graduate attribute both in terms of being effective citizens in democracy and being effective employees and leaders in modern organizations (Garcia, 2009), especially in the context of corporate social responsibility. Having said this, there